Friday, February 15, 2013

?Grand bargain? on deficit reduction: RIP?

President Obama's State of the Union address did nothing to address the nation's long-term fiscal imbalance, say deficit hawks. But Republicans share the blame.?

By Linda Feldmann,?Staff writer / February 13, 2013

Sometimes, a speech is significant not for the points it makes, but for the points it doesn?t make.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

President Obama?s State of the Union address Tuesday ? billed as the blueprint for his second term, not just the next year ? appears to be one such case. Missing in action, policy analysts say, was anything new toward a ?grand bargain? on federal deficits.

Mr. Obama applauded the $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years already achieved, and pledged to reach his longstanding target of $4 trillion. That would be enough to stabilize the ratio of debt to the nation?s economic output for that period, but it does little to address the long-term imbalance that looms in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, says former Clinton White House policy chief William Galston.

The annual budget deficit has sunk below $1 trillion for the first time in Obama?s tenure, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported last week. But the good news is temporary. The deficit curve will bend upward before long. Already, the debt as a share of GDP is slated to clock in at 76 percent by the end of FY2013 ? a historic high, per the CBO.

?Obama appears to have decided that there is no possibility of resolving the larger fiscal issues on terms that he and his party would find acceptable,? writes Mr. Galston, a scholar at the Brookings Institution in Washington. ?So he will hand these issues off to the next president, who will no longer enjoy the luxury of delay.?

In his address, Obama spoke of the need for ?modest reforms? in Medicare, without elaboration. More clear is what he opposes. He rejects raising the age of Medicare eligibility above 65, his spokesman said Monday. In his speech, Obama rejected any cuts to Medicare or Social Security as part of a deal to get around the deep cuts in defense spending in the March 1 ?sequester.?

Obama also departed from his prepared text to suggest that deficit reduction is not the urgent matter some make it out to be.


outside lands 2012 lineup beloved ufc results water for elephants old school nick swisher jaco

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.